The film, Triumph of the Will, was one of the most powerful propaganda tools, of The Nazi Party’s fascist regime. Made by Leni Riefenstahl, the film personifies Hitler as a powerful figure, curating an image of nobility, and authority. The aerial views of the party’s members, accompanied by optimistic music, portray the fascist leader as someone who will lead the nation to world domination. Aryan Germans were targeted as an audience for this film, for the usage of nationalistic ideologies fueled the plans of The Nazi Party. Through footage of the rallies of The Hitler Youth, to the parades, filled with stormtroopers, bearing the Nazi symbols, Riefenstahl curated an image of superiority, making anyone who went against it, feel left out, and separated from the “correct” side of society. As much as these clips led Aryan Germans to feel that they were a part of the superior, mainstream, German culture, they also made non Aryan citizens feel displaced. The clearly anti semitic chants of the rallies, and the symbols on the flags, that came to be understood as anti Jewish images, were focused on, to make any non Aryan citizens feel as if their life was wrong. The images and ideas, curated by Riefenstahl, in her film, creates two distinct emotions, of fear and nationalism, that are complete, polar, opposites.
Leni Riefenstahl’s horrific film, of The Nazi Party, in their early days, became known as one of the starting markers for their hate fueled rule. Though the high dedication to nationalism that the German citizens had, and the obviously anti semitic chants that they bellowed through the streets of Germany, were very clearly fueled by hatred, Riefenstahl was ensured that she would not offend anyone, by Hitler, himself. In an excerpt, from Leni Riefenstahl: A Memoir, she recalls a conversation with Hitler, who ensured her creative freedom of the film, and promised protection of her work. Through these seemingly thoughtful statements, Riefenstahl followed any orders of Hitler, and other Nazi leaders, such as the focus on their images, for it would make it “possible to emphasize the contributions of each person with few words” (Riefenstahl, 163). Through this particular scene, Riefenstahl unknowingly glorified the men, that would go on to kill over six million Jewish people, in the following years, of their regime. Though Riefenstahl did not know the future progressions of The Nazi Party, there were most certainly areas of trigger, that could have signified any potential development, into a regime that would create monstrous devastations, all around the world. Many former Nazi soldiers have been persecuted, following the conclusion of WWII, even if they are found decades later. Though Riefenstahl was following the orders of her filmmaking, Nazi soldiers were following the orders of Hitler, with both contributing to the allowance of the hateful progression, of The Nazi Party. Leni Riefenstahl enabled The Nazi Party, to gain new heights, and new support, even if she was not aware of her action’s consequences. Retrospectively, Riefenstahl should be held accountable for her actions, just as any individual involved with the murders of the Jewish people.
Leni Riefenstahl should be remembered as someone who glorified The Nazi Party, even though she was unaware of their future progression, at the time of filming. There are many points of uncertainty, regarding Riefenstahl’s “apolitical,” beliefs, and her claims to have not been in support of the Nazi ideology. In the text, The Mass Psychology of Fascist Cinema, by Frank P. Tomasulo, he points out how Riefenstahl’s justification for her film was too simplistic. “In content, the film emphasizes upbeat and patriotic themes that convey a renewed sense of national identity and unity following a period of economic and political instability. This is precisely the mood one would expect in a motion picture depicting the annual rally of a partisan political party: how-ever, Leni Riefenstahl's insistence that ‘there is no tendentious commentary for the simple reason that there is no commentary at all. It is history-pure history’” (Tomasulo, 102). To assume that Riefenstahl had no opinion on The Nazi Party’s ideologies, is ignoring the fact that she produced a film, that was glorifying them. Separating the art from the artist is a huge topic of discussion, but there are certain rules that need to be considered, when taking this into account. The Nazi Party’s inexcusable actions, were glorified in this film, regardless if Riefenstahl believed their ideologies, or not. Riefenstahl’s artistry should be tied to her propaganda, for she contributed to the further progression, glorification, and popularity, of The Nazi Party’s ideologies. Due to Triumph of the Will, portraying such dark, hate rooted, ideologies, Riefenstahl cannot be separated from her work, just as any member of The Nazi Party, cannot be separated from the party’s actions, whether they carried them out, or not.