posts 16 - 30 of 30
random
Dorchester, Massachusetts, US
Posts: 8
Although it necessarily doesn’t have to have these characteristics for a society to be considered fascist, most of them are very important for the aspect of fascism. In the Excerpt from Ur- Facism expresses fourteen features of fascism that include cult of tradition, syncretism, no advancement of learning, rejection of modernism, cult of action, no form of syncretism can accept criticism, dissent, social frustration, no social identity, humiliation by the enemy’s vaunted wealth and power, no struggle for life, but, rather a life for struggle, elitism, heroism, qualitative populism, and newspeak. In my opinion I believe that no advancement in learning is an important aspect of ur- facism. In the excerpt from “Ur- Fascism,” by Umberto Eco, it says, “The truth has already been announced once and for all, and all we can do is continue interpreting its obscure message.” I found this interesting and this could imply that objective truth exists but it is not universally understood or clear at the start. It illustrates that since he is the leader and he is the one who says what is true, that means everyone else has to believe him because there is “nothing wrong about what he says.” In the quote, there is a mention of the word obscure, which means that it is not easy to grip. In society of humans, it is said that we should not create new truths, but be involved with the interpretation of the already existing truths. This would mean that people and or leaders do not make new truths that people will have to believe, but that everyone goes by the already interpreted and existing roles of truth. The definition of fascism is that it is a far right, authoritarian political system characterized by a powerful dictator, extreme nationalism, and the suppression of opposition. Fascism is important because it impacted the 20th century through its nationalist ideology, which could possibly lead to authoritarianism, oppression, and violence. Scapegoating was an important characteristic for a society to be considered fascist because it allowed an explanation for societal problems such as social unrest or economic hardship. Fascist leaders created an “us vs. them” mentality, which is to view the world in terms of groups (us vs out), which can lead to favoritism for one group and prejudice within another group. Facism was so easily accepted by people in societies in the past because of economic hardship and political instability. Economic hardship was for the ones that felt abandoned by traditional systems. The characteristics that represent the most danger to ordinary people in society are violence, manipulation, and the disregard for social norms. Violence or weapons of any sort are the direct potential of danger to the safety of others and what people could do to hurt them. Manipulation is for the ones who lie and are a threat to people’s emotional, physical, and financial well- being. Disregard for social norms are the ones who violate laws, rules, boundaries, and the ones who mainly engage in criminal aspects that demonstrate a fundamental rejection.
EmmetOlive14
Boston, Massachussets, US
Posts: 8

Fascism in the Modern Age

The characteristics that must be present within a society for it to be fascist are authoritarian leadership,suppression of democracy,scapegoating of certain minority groups, and propaganda. There are many other things that may be incorporated into a fascist society but in my own opinion I think that these are the most important because without them a society cannot be fascist. I believe the characteristics that represent the most danger to the ordinary people in society is the suppression of democracy, and the scapegoating of the certain minority groups. I think this is because with the suppression of democracy within a society people no longer have the freedom to do what they want within a society. These lack of freedoms take away from the differences within society and cause the group to conform into being all very alike, and within the likes of the leaders of the fascist movements. I believe that the scapegoating of the minority group also represents a lot of danger to the general republic because it puts the blame on just ordinary people for doing nothing wrong at all. Within this the fascist leaders are able to get away with a lot more terrible things, and just by putting the blame upon the minority group. An example of this would be Nazi Germany during WW2. The Nazi party which was led by Adolf Hitler did absolutely atrocious things to the society while leading there fascist movement, and put the blame upon the minority group which was the Jews. Although they did not do anything they were discriminated against, and sent to concentration camps where millions were slaughtered in cold blood. This movement shows how dangerous and affecting the fascist movement was to the ordinary people in society who did not affect any part of what was going on within the fascist movements. Facism was often accepted easily in past societies because it came more often in periods of severe economic instability, social fragmentation, and widespread disillusionment with existing political systems, which allowed for the leaders who gave good speeches or were charismatic to present the fascist movements as a good alternative for there society. They would present the movement as one that promised national pride,unity,and order which many of these past societies did not have during times of struggle. Many of the people were already exhausted from unemployment, and inflation and were drawn to the appeal that there society would become strong and discipline, and that just maybe they would be able to get out of the economic struggles. While the things that werent good with the fascist regime such as the scapegoating of minorities,violence, and complex problems were not presented as much as the other more positive things within the regime. This caused the citizens to underestimate how power the movement could become. Many of the citizens would comply to the fascist regime out of fear of intimidation, and political repression. Many also feared that they would be harmed or taken in by the regime do to going against the ideas. The rest of the citizens suffered from conformity due to it being the easy was out of the problems within there lives.

purplegiraffe_15
Boston, MA, US
Posts: 8

Fascism in the Modern Age LTQ

In order for a society to be considered fascist, it must be defined by hypernationalism, dictatorship, and conformity to a singular ideology. Although there are other aspects tied to fascist societies, these three components combined are the foundation and should serve as key indicators that civilization is turning towards fascism. Another key aspect of fascism is the way it has always historically begun: discontentment with a certain economic, social, or political issue. In the chaos of the issue, any group can swoop in and claim they have the solution to the issue. This group can easily transform the country into a fascist society if people aren’t wary of it. Conformity is especially dangerous when these developments are taking place, as resistance becomes impossible. A lack of intellectual thinking, or ideas that deviate from the norm, results from conformity. Once this happens, the government has full control over the thoughts of the people and can manipulate it however it pleases in order to maintain rule. In the past, fascism was easily accepted by people because humans tend to think simplistically. From a psychological point of view, people will prefer to think plainly before they are required to think critically. This creates a flaw as society modernizes because many will tend to fall back on simple solutions and conspiracies to answer much more complex issues. For example, the Nazi party pinned all the misfortune of Germany on the actions of Jewish people and communists. Creating an enemy to blame for the economic and societal disaster of post WWI Germany creates a unified, nationalist German identity. Umberto Eco, in his book Ur-Fascism, describes that “to those with no social identity at all, Ur-Fascism says that their only privilege is the most common privilege of all, that of being born in the same country [. . . .] the only ones who can provide the nation with an identity are the enemy” (Eco 21). Creating an us vs. them mentality through hypernationalist rhetoric allowed the Nazis to “provide the nation with an identity” and unite the people under a common ideology (Eco 21). The Nazi party took advantage of people’s preference to believe in conspiracies and hatred for a common enemy in order to consolidate power and influence within Germany.

Currently, the US also displays some characteristics of historic fascist societies, particularly intense nationalism. The Make America Great Again movement mirrors the same right-winged hypernationalistic rhetoric of fascist societies of the past. In addition, it emphasizes redeeming or enhancing the power of their country. The MAGA movement hopes to strengthen the economy through domestic manufacturing and creating a self-sufficient US. Similar to Nazi Germany, the followers of this movement have intense pride in their country and a savior figure that they believe will guide America towards glory. MAGA allows people to find a sense of belonging, supporting similar goals and conforming to one ideology. These aspects still appeal to people today because, again, people like to think simplistically. People in MAGA are typically seen by others as uneducated and unaware of what they’re supporting because they are so swept up in the movement and a desire for change.


ilovelexi23
West Roxbury, Massachusetts, US
Posts: 9

For a society to be considered fascist, authoritarian control, nationalism, and violence must be present. These are just some of the many characteristics that make up a fascist society. Fascist societies will have a strong worship of a leader who influences all of the things present in society. Hitler in Nazi Germany is a huge example of a fascist society; he influenced everyone blindly with propaganda and fear. It is also seen in fascist societies that there is a scapegoat, a group of people that is easy to point the finger at, the “outsiders.” In the reading, “The Psychology of Fascism” from Comparative Civilizations Review, they explain, “The characteristics of Generic Fascism may include identity politics; the creation of a nationalistic authoritarian state; the positive evaluation of violence; the extreme stress on masculinity; the exalting of youth over other phases of life; an attack on individual thinking and egalitarianism; and an authoritarian, charismatic style of leadership.” This introduces even more characteristics that are necessary in which Ziegler introduces.

One of the most important elements is the establishment of a leader who has total control over a society. This control is achieved through a cult personality, propaganda, and fear. They are presented as the nation's savior, even though that is not the case, and they are putting more people in danger. They demand absolute loyalty, and it involves taking away human rights and privacy to make sure they receive it. They gain tight control over every aspect of life, including the media, the economy, and education, to ensure there are no rebels. A fascist society overall puts the interests of the nation over individual lives.

One of the other most dangerous parts of fascism is the leader's pick of the scapegoats or people who are easy for the leader to blame for the nation's failures. For example, in Germany, Hitler was the leader of the Nazis, and he would do anything to maintain his power. He put all the blame on the Jews, even though they were innocent, and they were killed for something they had no control over. When groups are singled out, it leads to discrimination and genocide. It is very dangerous for certain people to be targeted. Blaming others for problems gives ordinary citizens a sense of control in everything. People's freedom is stripped away from them, and innocent citizens are at a high risk of violence and imprisonment.

In the past, fascism was so easily accepted by societies because of economic instability, fear, propaganda, nationalism, and pride. Each of these reasons played a role in making citizens accept fascism in society. When citizens had economic instability, it made it easier for them to follow fake promises of making the nation better because they wanted to believe it was true. Glorifying the leader was also a way in which a leader with total control could remain in power. As leaders like this, they emphasize the nation's greatness and show pride in the nation's appeal to people's need to belong.

ChickenBurger
Dorchester Center, MA, US
Posts: 8

A fascist society and government are easy to identify, but they are hard to overthrow once they build momentum and gain both popularity, and power. When a fascist government rises to power and takes control of a country, its people, and its resources, there are very common practices and ideologies that they follow. First, they focus very heavily on their military and constantly improving it, they also often boast this massive military. Second, they are all right leaning and conservative , some more than others but all of them share it in a sense. And lastly, their governments all started as democracies and then slowly, or quickly, turned into a dictatorship where only one party was allowed in the government and they had total rule over all of its branches. This essentially lets them do whatever they want with the country, its military, land, citizens, and money. Obviously, this leads to greed, overspending, and overall poor treatment of the country and its economy. When these fascist dictatorships eventually crumble, they leave behind a broken shell of what was often a great and wealthy country. They destroy the economy, they brainwash their citizens with propaganda, and they often kill innocent civilians due to their race, sexual orientation, disability, and many other factors. “Hard right is a term that has been widely used by media outlets, including the Guardian. Rooduijn advised against it. “I think it’s more confusing than anything else,” he said. Often, the term is used to describe parties that may have moderated their tone or stances while campaigning for an election, or once they are in government. “Parties do change over time; they can become more, or less, moderate,” Rooduijn said.” Hard right parties are most certainly the most extreme, dangerous, and radical parties that have the abilities to bring war, death, and suffering to the entire planet. A great example of this is the Nazi party. They slowly crept their way into power with Hitler eventually being named as chancellor of Germany. From there, he dissolved all political parties but his, took full control of the entire government, and started his ethnic cleanse of Germany, slaughtering anyone who did not fit his physical criteria. What is most striking however, is how Hitler began his full dive into a far right and extremist dictatorship. When the Reichstag building, home to the German Parliament, caught fire, it allowed Hitler to place full and total blame on communists and led people to believe that there were people within the state that were trying to overthrow and topple Germany. Using this as a motive, he was allowed to publicly massacre millions of Jewish people, along with millions of other innocent civilians.

In today's climate, America is seeming more and more like a dictatorship to people. Donald Trump is often labelled as a fascist, and a villain, and America is seeming more and more divided every day. The actions of the government are increasingly getting closer to the fine line between Democracy and a Fascist Dictatorship.


ilovelexi23
West Roxbury, Massachusetts, US
Posts: 9

Originally posted by funny bunny on November 25, 2025 09:35

A characteristic that must be present for a society to be considered fascist is no toleration for advancement of learning. This hinders the knowledge of the people in the society and makes it hard for them to see the truth and what’s actually going on around them. In addition to that, it also makes them rely on their government more since they are trained to think that only the government knows what the truth is and how to help them, and this is very dangerous as they will not realize how badly they are being mistreated as they are conditioned to think that it’s normal. This is mentioned in Ur-Fascism as Eco says that “the truth has already been announced once and for all,” which is a further example of how the truth of a fascist society is only revealed and shown by the government and no one can add onto it. Another characteristic that must be present is the rejection of modernization and advancement. A quote that exemplifies this characteristic is in Ur-Fascism, as it says that “the official Fascist intellectuals were mainly committed to accusing modern culture and the liberal intelligentsia of having abandoned traditional values.” This adds onto the idea that they don’t want advancements as the people who were considered the smart things accused and targeted those who tried to have advancements and changes, which further hinders the society from advancing and becoming more modern.

Between these two characteristics, I think that the anti-intellectualism characteristic represents the most danger to ordinary people. Although rejection of modernization is dangerous to ordinary people, anti-intellectualism is significantly more dangerous. I think that a society can still function without it being as modernized as other nations, but rejecting advancement of learning makes it easier for the government or a single person in the government to take advantage of the people of society since they don’t have any other learning to challenge what the government is telling them. This also makes it easier for the government to manipulate the people as they have the control on what society believes is true or not as they are the one providing them their knowledge. I also think this is why fascism was so accepted by people in societies in the past as the people of those fascist societies at the time only were able to believe what their fascist leaders were telling them as they were conditioned to believe that the government knew what was best for them. Adding onto this, I also think that it has to do with conformity since there could have also been a good amount of people who agreed with the fascist ideologies and people who were scared to go against the government. Although we do not live in a fascist country, this anti-intellectualism is shown a bit in the way Trump is challenging the Department of Education as he wants it to be dismantled. With this executive order, it shows a bit of his anti-intellectualism since the Department of Education helps extend the knowledge of the people of our society, and dismantling it will only hinder us and start to rely on the government more for our knowledge.

I loved reading my peers response, the most compelling idea in my peer's post is stopping people from learning and how dangerous that can be. It can be even more dangerous than rejecting modernization. I agree completely on this, and I didnt touch on it in my post a lot, but it connects to my idea of manipulation from the nations leader. Citizens tend to just listen to what a fascist leader would say without thinking of the harm of not understanding why your acting the way you are. I think if the government controls all the knowledge it allows for them to easily manipulare people and be mistreated. One of her main ideas she uses is Ecos idea that all truth is already known which creates the anti-intellectualism impact on citizens. This is what makes citizens rely on leaders and puts them in the greatest danger. I liked your example connecting alk of this to trump but I think it couldve been stronger if you linked in the idea of a single official truth into the Trump example. Overall, this response to the question was very good and it describes several ideas connecting to major examples of danger in a fascist society.

wazzah123
South Boston, MA, US
Posts: 8

Fascism is a right-leaning political movement that is complex. It’s compared to jello as it shifts to take many different forms depending on the time. There are many characteristics that could be present for a society to be considered fascist. When discussing this topic during class, I noted that my peers pointed out characteristics such as a strong leader, ultra nationalism, propaganda, the youth perspective, and manipulation. Although this list isn't every characteristic that could represent a fascist society, I think they are pretty important ones that represent the most danger to ordinary people in society. Stated by Umberto Eco in his Excerpts from Ur-Fascism “all you need is one of them to be present, and a Fascist nebula will begin to coagulate.” Umberto is suggesting that there are many aspects making up fascism and fascist societies, so even having just one of these traits present could lead to a fascist state. Furthermore, fascism was so easily accepted by people in societies in the past because it was easy to use a scapegoat, a group or person to point a finger at as the “outsiders” and blame them for problems and conflicts in society. If there was one group being blamed, ordinary people would just hop on board and believe what the majority was saying.

Whether the United States is currently experiencing characteristics of historic fascist societies is an ongoing debate. People argue that president Donald Trump is a fascist leader as he displays fascist characteristics. These characteristics include scapegoating, presenting himself as the best leader, and political violence. They say he points a finger at immigrants as threats to our country and then has them removed through programs like ICE. It’s also said that his MAGA movement creates a place for people to take immense pride in their country, having a strong sense of nationalism. On the other hand, others disagree with the idea that Trump is a fascist leader. He doesn’t point a finger at immigrants just because he feels like it. He supports legal immigration and wants the illegal immigrants removed from the country since they didn’t enter legally. He never tried to oppress his opposition and his policies are not race based, rather focused more on illegal immigration.

The current climate in the US is different from fascist societies that we have seen throughout history. Unlike North Korea where the citizens are strictly monitored and their media is all propaganda to only allow access to what the president wants them to see, the US government doesn’t block out certain perspectives and we are able to access different perspectives all the time. In addition, I don’t think our democratic society is immune to fascist ideology, but since there’s so much diversity in the US it’s definitely easier to resist it. Finally I’d like to say that right-leaning political movements aren’t inherently fascist, rather it’s hyperbolic rhetoric used to bring attention to conservative ideas that the left disagrees with. This is dangerous as the left is tossing around the term fascism which is diluting the meaning of it.




ilovecoffee
Boston, Massachusetts, US
Posts: 9

There are a number of different criteria that must be present for a regime to be considered fascist. However, not each aspect is necessary and different combinations of factors can be seen across different regimes. Additionally, many countries possess some of these characteristics, but that doesn't necessarily mean that they are fascist. Some examples of these criteria include: ultra nationalism, worship of the leader, social conservatism, supremacy of the military, desire for territorial expansion, anti-intellectualism, obsession with “enemies within,” scapegoats, lack of human rights, propaganda, return to traditional gender roles, and glorification of the past. The criteria pertaining to traditionalism are also touched upon in Umberto Eco’s “Ur-Fascism” when he discusses the “cult of tradition” and its historical origins and how it ties into other aspects of fascism, such as no advancement of learning.

One of the aspects of fascism that represents one of the greatest threats to ordinary people is the desire for territorial expansion. In many cases, this will eventually lead to some sort of conflict, such as a war. This then causes unnecessary violence and puts the citizens in harm’s way. They may also then have to fund such wars, which could hurt the economy and the people. Another aspect of fascism that poses a threat to the people is the rise of anti-intellectualism. This is because it discourages the intellectual thought that allows people to question these fascist regimes and stop them from imposing laws and policies that are drastic and harmful. Two other criteria that represent a threat to the ordinary people are a lack of human rights and the identification of a scapegoat, which often go hand in hand. Fascist regimes typically choose a group to target, and then deprive them of their human rights, subjecting them to unimaginable atrocities. This has occurred on many different occasions, such as German antisemitism in the 1930s-40s eventually leading to the Holocaust. A final criteria that poses a threat is a glorification of the past. This is often what causes things such as traditionalism and a return to past gender roles to occur, and it erases the advancements that these countries have experienced before the regime, such as the granting of rights to a previously marginalized group.

Fascism was at its most popular in the mid to late 1900s. This was a century that faced a number of different conflicts such as both world wars or the great depression, and these had a huge impact on societies across the world. Because of this, a sense of demoralization arose, which allowed for these fascist regimes to take hold. They provided people with an outlet for their emotions and a cause that made them feel like they were a part of something big. These regimes also frequently honed in on a common enemy, and this also contributed to the rise of these regimes as it united people.

There are many criteria for fascist societies, which makes it easy to assume that a number of different societies are fascist, but in reality it is an incorrect assumption. The country may be facing issues, but that doesn’t mean that they will form a fascist regime. Many of these criteria also have the capacity to pose great threats to the common people, and many of them are interconnected. This also leads many to wonder why there would be any appeal for fascism if it so negatively affects people, but it is because it arises as a source of hope and belonging in times of great turmoil.

applebeesandthesevenseas
boston, Massachusetts, US
Posts: 8

Facism consists of a variety of factors, and doesn’t follow a strict set of rules. It is hard to define, but rather relies on a cluster of recognizable characteristics that work together on people. It doesn’t rely solely on one factor but on the intensity of multiple factors. However there are a few key characteristics that can help to define these societies as fascist. These features include intense nationalism, the limitation of knowledge, as well as a hierarchy built off of the hate of others. Fascist societies often contain nationalism, which promotes unity and collective choices. Nationalism brings people to feel as though they are a part of a community and find a purpose in their lives, placing themselves in a feeling of safety and superiority. This can lead to people accepting harmful ideas and being easily manipulated. Fascist societies also use the community to gain control and from this there tends to form an idea of superiority in the country. From this, a fascist society tends to include a hierarchy that pushes people to scorn those at the bottom and strive to move up. From this grows a society full of pressure and distrust. Fascist societies tend to create a fear of people who may appear different or like “outsiders.” This can become super dangerous as it takes away from the humanity of individuals and the beauty of diversity. The Psychology of Fascism: Wilhelm Reich Et Al includes an important reflection from Ziegler, “ (Zeigler, 2021, p.24): At the center of the anti-enlightenment lies the idea that humans are all different, should not be treated equally, should not be handled according to their deeds, and should not be respected as individuals. (This idea) degrades the roles of freedom and individual human rights and promotes national myths and legends.” This emphasizes how society will move away from diversity and individuality and stray toward conformity and group decisions with easy influential people. This becomes very dangerous as it allows dictatorship, mass movements and groupthink. Another incredibly important factor is the societal push towards anti-intellectualism and disregard for facts and knowledge. As written by Umerto Eco in an excerpt from ‘ur fascism’ in How to spot a fascist (1997, 2001), “there can be no advancement of learning.” This allows people to be uncertain of a truth and therefore easier to manipulate. When citizens are denied access to information they cannot challenge government actions and access point of views. The danger of these characteristics is how unnotiable they may be to those living in the society. People fall into the trap of society and the masses when it is too late so it is always important to look out for these situations. In the past many societies have embraced these fascist ways not solely because the people desired a form of cruelty, but because these fascist ideologies offered simple solutions during complicated unpredictable times. Society becomes fascist from these dangerous traits and thrives of off the exploitation of human desires for certainty, identity and purpose.

GreenBlock0213
Posts: 8

Characteristics that I think must be present for a society to be considered fascist is ultra-nationalism, the restriction of civil liberties and freedom of speech, and a charismatic figure that is able to rally people together that are vulnerable due to their own experiences or are looking for a simple solution to a complex problem. These reasons that are listed are definitely some characteristics that represent the most danger to ordinary people in society, but some more characteristics that I think pose a great danger to ordinary people in society are political instability and the celebration and advertisement of militarism. Fascism was so easily accepted by people in societies in the past because they were in economic turmoil and political instability, this led the people to turn to whatever reason they could find to blame as the root cause of these events, even if that meant ostracizing a group of people, and this transition to fascism is usually led by a charismatic leader. I think the United States is experiencing characteristics of historic fascist societies but it is not a direct mirror of fascist societies in the past, because since it has been a long time since the last notable fascist society, these characteristics have definitely evolved and changed and this shows that current nations may embody some characteristics but it is different than any historic fascist regime. There is also polarization in the United States and even some very far left or right-winged groups blaming a certain group of people for their problems or scapegoating. These characteristics have evolved and appear differently than in the 20th century, and these are often expressed through media and political discourse instead of direct authoritarian control. These traits and other ones have remained appealing because they provide identity, belonging, and security. The nationalist rhetoric can make people feel valued and led by strong leaders who promise quick and easy fixes to appeal to those who are frustrated with slow democratic processes. In a world of economic inequality, cultural change, and political change, the simplicity and feeling of certainty offered by these leaders can feel reassuring, even if they carry dangerous consequences. This glorification of national pride and the promise of restoring greatness resonate with those who feel left behind, making these traits even more emotionally powerful despite their grave consequences. The current U.S. climate differs from historic fascist societies because democratic institutions, free elections, and civil society still function as guardrails. Unlike Germany or Italy in the 1930s, the U.S. has stronger checks and balances that make fascism less likely. Democracy is also not immune to fascist ideology since history has shown that even strong systems can erode if their citizens stop upholding the rules and barriers. Although this can happen, the U.S. system is more resilient than societies that collapsed or transitioned into authoritarianism. Right-leaning movements are not inherently fascist, conservatism emphasizes tradition, a limited government, and free markets. While fascism demands authoritarian control, suppression of oppression., and militarized nationalism. This label of conservative ideas as fascist is often exaggerated to discredit political opponents rather than an accurate description.

wrox797
Boston, Massachusetts, US
Posts: 3

There are many different aspects of a fascist society that differ throughout time. However there are a few constants. One aspect that is essential in a fascist society is extreme nationalism. Nationalism is how the dictator garners support for his ideology, and he uses patriotic feelings in the mass to say that what they are doing is justified, because everyone else is not as good as them. It can also allow them to appear moderate to the people, so that more ordinary people start to support them. For example, when the Nazis were first rising to power, they severely toned down the anti Semitic rhetoric in their party and outwardly focused more on trying to restore Germany to its former glory. This is one of the most dangerous aspects of fascism, as it is how they rope in the regular people in a society and transform them into radicals.

For people to accept leaders like Hitler and Mussolini, there would have to be some level of civil unrest and upset in the people. A stable society does not vote for dictators. The people are looking for a quick and easy fix to a complicated problem, that’s why they want dictators. The burden they felt post World War I was a financial one caused by the Treaty of Versailles. This indebted Germany 33 billion dollars, along with cutting their army size in half. The people had to work to compensate for this burden, and now half of the men in the army have no way of getting pay to support their families. The German people had felt like they had been wronged by their previous government and by the Allies, which is what drew them to powerful figures like Hitler. He said what they wanted to hear and he was put into the seat of a dictator by the people.

`Since there are many different aspects of fascism in many different fascist regimes, there can be certain aspects that exist in a democratic society. For instance, there can be a strong pride in the country about their culture and heritage. There is nothing wrong with being proud of your nation and where you came from, the problem arises when it starts to become a feeling of inherent superiority to other people.

Right winged ideologies are therefore not inherently fascist, as even though they can share aspects. I believe it is more in the way that the beliefs are carried out more than anything else. Fascists seek to impose their ideas onto others in order to maintain control and keep chaos at a minimum, while ideas on the right do not seek to impose beliefs onto anyone forcefully

abrahamlincoln2.0
Boston, MA, US
Posts: 9

Originally posted by D4T4ZOID on November 23, 2025 20:40

Despite facism being a very complex and ever shifting topic depending on context and time, there are main characteristics that make it what it is. That being dictatorship, scapegoating, and means to keep everything in its central government. From information kept secret from the public, to common knowledge for it to then be questioned as fact. It's a means to keep everything in the hands of those in charge. Letting the people know little so they can’t defy. An example of this is in 1984, where “big brother” is kept under totalitarian control through surveillance. Keeping everyone under his hand, as well as containing information about things he doesn't want them to know about. This is what draws a connection between facism and totalitarianism. For again, facism can shift into different forms of context, which in this case is different forms of control. This also branches out into other intense means of control. Another connection for this is shown in the Excerpts from Ur-Fascism, that being the topic of “Traditionalism. It implies the rejection of modernism. Both the Fascists and the Nazis worshiped technology.” When it comes to the mix of traditionalism and fascism it mainly dims down to the idea of hierarchy and the extent of how high authority should range to.

Coming back to the initial idea of the first set of questions, the fascist characteristics that I’ve mentioned were easily accepted in society because of the example I used before as well, it was accepted without the people even knowing it. Fascist ideals were hidden or tweaked to fit what everyone wanted for its time. Similar to the tactic Hitler used in his rise to power. He spoke of ways he would bring Germany to its formal glory, aka scapegoating. Making a different group seem like the problem, all the while that was the problem itself. Putting the blame on someone else instead of actually taking action and facing the hardships that happen naturally when trying to make a nation grow as a whole. But of course, the people of this time didn’t process this. So caught up in pinning the blame on someone else, they forgot about their own problems as a group. Because of course, humans by nature normally don’t want to hear and face something they don’t like. And normally, people don’t like considering that they may be the problem, that they may be the person holding themselves back. Because that's taxing on the brain, it means having to grow as a person. It isn’t easy, so people don’t like it. It shows why people were so unknowingly accepting of the fascist ideals, it's a blurred fine line that some people don’t face or look into. Because it doesn’t have a simple definition. It’s easy to put the hard work on someone else. It's why simplicity is so common when it comes to the people who are unwillingly accepting these views.

I agree with the characteristics of fascism you listed. I think that dictatorship, scapegoating, and enforcing the central government are all important indicators of a fascist regime. I really like how you used Big Brother from 1984 as an example because it really helps show the extent of how corrupted a fascist regime can be. I also said that scapegoating and enforcing the central government were signs of a fascist government too, but I didn’t say dictatorship was. After reading your explanation though, I do believe that dictatorship is one of the more key indicators because it consolidates the power to one person, ultimately leading to the enforcing of the central government and anti-intellectualism.

I also said that these characteristics were so easily accepted because they were accepted unknowingly. For most civilians, they were completely unaware of the fascist regime being put in place because they just followed the government. With intellectuals being outcasted and single officials being placed into power, there was not much they could do but follow along. Thus, when they eventually did realize that something in society changed, it was already too late, and in order to let out their anger, they resorted to scapegoating the lower, already shamed communities.

ilovecoffee
Boston, Massachusetts, US
Posts: 9

Originally posted by raybradbury12 on November 24, 2025 08:53

Fascism is not one single or fixed ideology, but it is a collection of recurring political and social tendencies. In other words, it is like jello, taking the form of whatever period it is in. Umberto Eco’s “Ur-Fascism” argues that fascism is a “fuzzy totalitarianism" of fears like the cult of traditionalism, fear of difference, rejection of critical thought and the belief that the nation is under threat. These tendencies make fascism dangerous as they appeal to emotions over reason, especially during times of instability.

Historically, fascism was accepted because it promised order and identity to people who have often been living under a time of chaos. Ordinary people are drawn to fascist leaders because they offer "protection from chaos” and a sense of belonging. Especially when there are economic crises, rapid changes or cultural anxiety, fascism’s promise is more appealing. This psychology of wanting safety over liberty is one of the characteristics that is most dangerous to ordinary people.

Whether the United States, or other nations today show characteristics similar to history fascist societies is complex. The US is not a fascist nation, but there are definitely certain tendencies Eco identities that appear today. One is the emphasis and sentiment of being under attack and the scapegoating of minority immigrants. Another is the attack on intellectual institutions, whether it be higher education or research, in order to allow more reliance on the government. Another is the rise of conspiracy theories or obsessions with plots, which create more fear among citizens.

The New York Times article “With Trump’s Victory, Europe’s Populist Right Sees Return of a Fellow Believer” shows how these tendencies are resonated globally. The article says that Viktor Orban “gambled heavily and publicly on a Trump victory” and celebrated it as proof that populist, anti-immigration politics are gaining momentum across Europe. This shows how modern movements borrow energy from one another and use election victories elsewhere as validation of their own ideology. It also shows how appeals to unified national identity or border protection can unite populist leaders across the world.

It;s important to be able to distinguish between conservatism, populism, and fascism because though they may have overlapping or values in common, they mean drastically different things. Many conservative movements can emphasize national sovereignty or tighter immigration without rejecting democracy. The US today still has strong democratic institutions, a free press (for now) and active civil society. But these differences separate it from societies that succumbed to fascism in the 20th century. Democracy isn’t automatically immune because fascism thrives when people lose faith in democratic norms. Building sentiments can view opponents as enemies and accept machismo or strongman politics as a solution.

Another major danger in the United States today is that polarization is deepening and aspects of fear, tribalism, and idealization of the past can gain support. Being able to recognize these patterns can help us understand how democratic societies can drift toward authoritarianism if political culture weakens and citizens stop defending diversity and pluralism.

I agree with everything that was said in this response. One thing that immediately stood out to me was the comparison of fascism to jello, meaning that it takes the form of whatever period it is in. I feel like this is a very accurate comparison and way to phrase the situation, and is exemplified by a number of different historical situations as well as our current political climate. I also really liked the connection between why fascism’s appeal is one of the threats to ordinary people. I wouldn't have thought of it in that way, but the fact that people are willing to accept safety over liberty truly is a big issue about the system. I also really liked how all of this was compared to the US and our current situation, and I agree that we really are drifting towards authoritarianism and our political culture is weakening in certain areas. One part of this response I also liked was how the lack of distinction between conservatism, populism, and fascism is very blurred in our modern day society, which leads to many accusations of fascism that are incorrect. This is a big issue in our society, and the overuse of this language takes from the gravity and meaning behind the word. Overall, I thought this was a great response that did a good job responding to multiple questions, and I agree with everything that was said.

funny bunny
Boston, Massachusetts, US
Posts: 9

Originally posted by EmmetOlive14 on November 25, 2025 10:53

The characteristics that must be present within a society for it to be fascist are authoritarian leadership,suppression of democracy,scapegoating of certain minority groups, and propaganda. There are many other things that may be incorporated into a fascist society but in my own opinion I think that these are the most important because without them a society cannot be fascist. I believe the characteristics that represent the most danger to the ordinary people in society is the suppression of democracy, and the scapegoating of the certain minority groups. I think this is because with the suppression of democracy within a society people no longer have the freedom to do what they want within a society. These lack of freedoms take away from the differences within society and cause the group to conform into being all very alike, and within the likes of the leaders of the fascist movements. I believe that the scapegoating of the minority group also represents a lot of danger to the general republic because it puts the blame on just ordinary people for doing nothing wrong at all. Within this the fascist leaders are able to get away with a lot more terrible things, and just by putting the blame upon the minority group. An example of this would be Nazi Germany during WW2. The Nazi party which was led by Adolf Hitler did absolutely atrocious things to the society while leading there fascist movement, and put the blame upon the minority group which was the Jews. Although they did not do anything they were discriminated against, and sent to concentration camps where millions were slaughtered in cold blood. This movement shows how dangerous and affecting the fascist movement was to the ordinary people in society who did not affect any part of what was going on within the fascist movements. Facism was often accepted easily in past societies because it came more often in periods of severe economic instability, social fragmentation, and widespread disillusionment with existing political systems, which allowed for the leaders who gave good speeches or were charismatic to present the fascist movements as a good alternative for there society. They would present the movement as one that promised national pride,unity,and order which many of these past societies did not have during times of struggle. Many of the people were already exhausted from unemployment, and inflation and were drawn to the appeal that there society would become strong and discipline, and that just maybe they would be able to get out of the economic struggles. While the things that werent good with the fascist regime such as the scapegoating of minorities,violence, and complex problems were not presented as much as the other more positive things within the regime. This caused the citizens to underestimate how power the movement could become. Many of the citizens would comply to the fascist regime out of fear of intimidation, and political repression. Many also feared that they would be harmed or taken in by the regime do to going against the ideas. The rest of the citizens suffered from conformity due to it being the easy was out of the problems within there lives.

I enjoyed reading my peer’s post as there were many parts of it that I found compelling. The first part is the idea that using scapegoats and suppression of democracy are necessary characteristics for a society to be fascist. I didn’t talk about this in my post, but I also agree strongly with this idea, since it allows the leader to manipulate the people and be the one who has the final say in what happens. This kind of connects to my idea that anti-intellectualism is necessary since they both suppress some type of characteristic in society that is able to rebel against the leading authoritarian. Adding onto this, another idea that I found compelling was the idea that fascism was so accepted because of the economic instability and social fragmentation that was happening during that time. We talked about this in class but I feel like my peer made great points that people saw fascism and fascist leaders more so as a way out of their troubles and despair rather than something that will hurt them more in the end. When something so harmful is viewed in such a good light it can be hard for people to see the true harms. Overall I really like this post.

I_G0t_r1ch_1n_my Amirizz
Boston, Massachusetts, US
Posts: 9
As the political environment within the United States continues to compound tensions between leftist and right conservatives, the question whether we're currently experiencing characteristics of a fascist society ever remains controversial. Nationalist sentiment for a christian sentiment, that is heavily influenced by conservatives within the political atmosphere, motivates a movement that popularizes Trump within the United States. While the United States is not a fascist nation, contemporary political rhetoric, social division, and democratic anxieties underscore historical patterns that Historians and scholars tie to fascism. Fascism is a far-right ultranationalist political ideology, in which an authoritarian leader uses total power to enforce their rule. If we were to examine present-day U.S. politics, this framework suggests fascist tendencies do exist within the public sphere. A similarity between the U.S. today and historical fascist societies is weaponization of fear. Fascism utilizes fear to mobilize its control. Leaders attempt to appeal to the fear of the public, placing the blame on democratic leaders. Fear of immigration, fear of failure in government, criminals, or cultural invaders that attempt to undermine their culture. This mirror fascist strategies used in Italy and Germany, where minority groups were blamed for economic or social instability. Fear is an effective tool used in Fascism to mobilize control. Another tool that seems to be used in the political atmosphere today is propaganda. There is much propaganda occurring within the sphere of the United States. The current administration has pushed numerous narratives to counteract bad narratives or critiques on their governing. Propaganda controls the image that is displayed. It paints actions in the administration in a good light, creating support for a fascist movement. According to the social conformity theory, people are bound to conform to what's popular rather than go against it. Propaganda is a powerful tool that, if done correctly, can mobilize the control of a fascist regime. Censorship has also been an alarming theme within the U.S, as the administration has sued, taken down, and discredited news outlets across the nation. The current administration has also commissioned the arrest of reporters and mobilized the army to instill that fear of pushing a bad narrative. In Censorship, the administration is able to control what is released and what isn’t, controlling what people are allowed to see. If people aren’t able to view what’s wrong with the government, or hear about what is wrong with the government, then people begin to rally in support of a fascist movement. All of the above have been extremely prevalent within the political sphere. I don’t believe the U.S. will ever become a fascist society due to our system of checks and balances. The power is split amongst the POTUS SCOTUS and COTUS. There are also numerous protests occurring around the nation, criticizing the leadership of the administration; with this happening, people are pushing to remove, prohibit, and disable actions that push a fascist agenda. Nevertheless, the possibility still exists. With the right amount of influence, political violence could be a catalyst that prompts a shift towards such rule.
posts 16 - 30 of 30