learn to question 1
How we see ourselves and how we see others are very closely related. How we see ourselves is informed by our experiences and our interests, and in some part how we want to be seen, but it is also informed by the way others perceive us. Self-esteem and self-image factor greatly into how we perceive ourselves. We either seek to further ourselves or align ourselves with the ways we are seen by other people; some misconceptions about our identities may cause us to want to act differently or treat others differently while positive perceptions make us eager to continue the approval, even on a subconscious level. This connects to the idea of the social conformity theory--we want to be welcomed by the majority.
At the same time, however, our actual identity is not really malleable by others--but the perception of our identity is. This is true whether the perceiver is us or an outsider. “How Social Media Shapes Our Identities” talks about how we increasingly live in an age where nothing is forgotten. Old pictures, messages, embarrassing videos--these things don’t represent who we define ourselves as anymore, yet the perception of us remains. The opposite is also true--you can mess up and still be the same person you were, even if outside opinion shifts. It really depends on the perceiver. If you align yourself with one party’s political beliefs, a member of a different party might judge you as a morally corrupt person (whether you are or not), whereas a peer would take no issue. This connects to the ingroup-outgroup idea.
I remember someone’s identity vessel had a mirror in it, and they talked about how other people will view the same identity differently in their response. Another vessel had red and blue light to allow you to only see one or another set of photos at a time. I thought both of these were very compelling, because they show how it really depends on your perspective of a person or the parts of their identity. Our individual experiences which make up our individual identities impact our individual perceptions of one singular person. No two people are exactly the same, nor will two people see the same thing in exactly the same way. This is part of why we judge people before we know them at all.
One example is religion. Christianity for some people is a welcoming, safe space and others find it unwelcoming or even alienating. This can lead to generalization about groups from either side--a Christian might assume someone who isn’t religious to be morally corrupt, just as someone who isn’t religious might extend their assumptions of the beliefs a Christian holds beyond the religious and into the political. They could assume the Christian holds prejudices against certain groups, whether that is true or not, because of their experience with some members of the religion. In reality, the two could’ve been best friends--that’s why it’s so important to learn to undo these assumptions of other people.