Questions to Consider:
Please use the questions as a guide for your post in addition to what you have learned from your ‘Dinner Table Debate” about the topic. You craft your LTQ post from your own personal position. You do not need to represent the side that you were assigned for the debate (although you can if you would like). You can choose to focus on two of the question sets, or to incorporate several of them into your response. Please be sure to include a response to question set 1 though.
1. Is voluntary eugenics, or the choice to alter the genetic makeup of offspring, immoral? Is it a matter of reproductive freedom or is it unethical interference in the process of life? Do the risks outweigh the benefits?
2. Even if technologies like CRISPR have benefits, does our history with eugenic policies over the last hundred years demonstrate humanity’s inability to use these technologies ethically? Can we ensure that these technologies don’t become a ‘slippery slope’ to something more sinister?
3. In addition to decreasing natural human variation, do gene editing technologies have the potential to lead to greater inequity in society because of the wealthy’s access to this technology? Does it increase social divisions?
4. Given that other, less democratic nations have access to gene-editing technologies is it irresponsible for more democratic nations to ban these technologies? Should governments ensure that individuals have the reproductive freedom to use these as they see fit?
Word Count Requirement: 500-750 words
Sources to Reference:
Please refer to the ideas, either using a quote or paraphrasing, from at least two of the sources in your response. You should also refer directly to your peers’ projects on the impact of race ‘science’ on US laws and policies.
Perspectives on gene editing (Harvard Gazette)
Fact Sheets about Genomics (National Institutes of Health)
What is immoral about eugenics? (National Library of Medicine)
The Dark Side of CRISPR (Scientific American)
Designer Babies Aren’t Futuristic…(MIT Technology Review)
The New Eugenics: Better than the Old (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Rubric to Review: LTQ Rubric